Book Review:
Ecology, community and lifestyle
by Arne Naess, translated and revised by David
Rothenberg
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1989.
This is a
profound but in many ways theoretically obscure and contradictory book.
It is necessary reading for
those who seek to understand deep
ecology and the non anthropocentric paradigm shift of values necessary
to
change how humans relate to the
natural world - so that all living beings and the Land itself, in Aldo
Leopold's
terms, have equal rights. It is
also necessary reading for those who seek to understand the growing
influence
of
the eight-point "Platform
for Deep Ecology", as a basic manifesto of agreement within the
environmental
movement. There is lots of good
advice for
activists, because Naess has been in many environmental campaigns
and is
critical and reflective. His writing being rooted in actual struggles,
stand in my view, in opposition to that
of many deep ecology academics,
e.g. Warwick Fox and Alan Drengson, and some magazines, e.g. the
Canadian publication The
Trumpeter. While personal transformation is necessary and
important, there are many
people writing
articles on deep ecology, who have become
focused on the psychological path to "transpersonal
ecology". This has meant
a fixation on the important concept of Self-realization, and away from
engagement in
changing the world. Naess, a
gentle self-deprecating person, has an inclusive and elliptical writing
style and
reasoning, which does not
lend itself to instant comprehension or analysis.
This book
should be required reading for those on the left who are into deep
ecology bashing or stereotypical
dismissal. Naess is developing a
new vocabulary and politics for a deep ecology politics and we are
conditioned
by traditional cultural thought
processes in how we evaluate this. This book shows that Naess has a
sophisticated
economic, political, and power
analysis, and a class perspective. See for example, the
discussion of the limitations
of the GNP and the sympathetic
but critical discussion of socialism. Regarding class, the following
quotations are
illustrative:
"Green politics
supports the elimination of class differences locally, regionally,
nationally, and globally."
"The global
aspect makes it clear that the majorities in the rich industrial states
belong
to the global
upper class.
This is easily forgotten by trade unions, and by some Marxist-Leninists
who still unilaterally
focus on the
liberation of the workers of their own rich countries."
Naess regards
class restrictions as restrictions on the possibilities of Self
realization
for individuals.
Personally, I
found this book an important contribution to understanding the
complexity
and theoretical richness
of deep ecology and the ideas of
Arne Naess, its philosophical founder. Yet, from a deep ecology
perspective,
I think Naess is sometimes wrong,
as in his support for "sustainable development", his sharp opposition
to the
concept of zero economic growth,
and his use of the human-centered term "resource". But it is becoming
apparent
that it is in the application
of a deep ecology perspective where subjective factors like judgement,
experience,
and class perspective become
crucial. People who are paddling in the same general direction, can
disagree on a
particular route to take.
In this book,
it often seems that when a conflict in stating a position becomes
apparent,
in order to avoid being
seen as sectarian and
threatening, Naess retreats to a "safer", more muddled position. This
comes through as
opportunistic. Naess has a
personal position of unilateral disarmament, but this was "unrealistic"
to advocate back
in Cold War days in northern
Europe, and therefore he calls for working within NATO to bring about
change.
The book also illustrates
positions by Naess such as, stress on talking with the opponent
(enemy?), absolute
commitment to non violence,
embracement of legality, etc.:
"It is a central norm of the Gandhian approach to
'maximise contact with
your opponent!'"
One often
feels that for Naess there are no enemies, but merely misguided people.
For a
person from the left,
Naess can seem to be dangerously
simple minded.
In "analyzing"
deep ecology it is necessary to understand that the acceptance of the
primacy of the natural world
is basically an "intuition" for
Naess and not logically or philosophically derived. The well known
eight-point
"Platform" gives a series of
basic ideas that are held in common. Yet, more fundamentally,
supporters of deep
ecology
share self-identification with the natural world, where an
injury to nature is an injury to the personal self.
The
"unfolding" of the individual connects with that of the whole planet.
There are a number of different roads to
a deep ecology perspective and
different political tendencies have now started to emerge among deep
ecology
writers. The radical "left"
tendency is represented by people like Richard Sylvan, Andrew
McLaughlin, and
David Johns. Whereas someone like
Robyn Eckersley, as
shown in her recent 1992 book,
Environmentalism
and Political Theory: Toward
an Ecocentric Approach, is a soft social democratic
leftist, and
follower of the transpersonal road which has emerged from deep ecology.
There have
been a number of editions of this book in Norwegian, prior to the
English translation. Ecology,
community and lifestyle,
subtitled "Outline Of An Ecosophy", is in part based on
a 1976 book
in
Norwegian by Arne Naess, but with
a number of sections rewritten and revised by the author and the
translator.
As well as the translator's
Introduction: "Ecosophy T: from intuition to system", there are
seven chapter
discussions: "The
environmental crisis and the deep ecological movement"; "From
ecology to ecosophy";
"Fact and value; basic norms";
"Ecosophy, technology, and lifestyle"; "Economics within
ecosophy";
"Ecopolitics within ecosophy";
and "Ecosophy T: unity and diversity of life". "Ecosophy",
an unfortunate
choice for a practical movement
term, is for Naess, a personal code of values guiding one s interaction
with
nature. He calls this for
himself, "Ecosophy T", named after his own mountain hut in Norway.
Reading this
book is the best single introduction to the basic deep ecology position
and the thinking of Arne
Naess, with all its
sophistication and its ambiguity.
David Orton - November 26,
1992.
Printed in CNS
(Capitalism, Nature, Socialism), volume 4, issue sixteen,
December1993.
To obtain any of the
Green Web publications, write to us at:
Green Web, R.R. #3, Saltsprings, Nova Scotia, Canada, BOK 1PO
E-mail us at: greenweb@ca.inter.net
Back
to
The Green Web
A Taste of
Green Web Writings and Left Biocentrism
Green
Web Book Reviews
http://home.ca.inter.net/~greenweb/Ecology,_community_and_
lifestyle.html
Last updated: January 16, 2005