Commentary
The Ecocentric Left and Green Electoralism
By David Orton
In the June
2004 federal election, the Green Party polled over 4 percent of the
votes. There is a discussion going
on about this newly emerged
"green" political force in Canada, about its social base and what
policies it should
be putting forth. This commentary
is a contribution to the debate.
What should be
the overall character of parties which call themselves Green and
advocate, as does the
Canadian party, that the public
should embrace them as a way forward out of the Earth-threatening
ecological
crisis? According to Saskatchewan
Green John Warnock, the Canadian party is "most right wing" of Green
parties in the English speaking
world. (1)
If one accepts
participating in electoral politics (which is a discussion in itself),
then what the federal Green
Party accomplished was quite an
achievement - that is, running candidates in all the federal ridings;
and
qualifying for the federal
electoral subsidy of $1.75 per vote, each year until the next election.
The Green Party
has clearly for the first time
become part of the federal political landscape in Canada. The current
leadership
of the party and party activists
must be given credit for this achievement. But, more importantly, the
emergence
of the federal party reflects
a developing green consciousness and base in Canadian society, to which
many
environmental and other non-party
green activists have long contributed.
What should be
the attitude of Greens towards conservatives who are sympathetic to
ecological
considerations, illustrated
perhaps by the support for David Orchard in the old Progressive
Conservative Party?
Orchard had about one third of
the members mobilized behind him, for an anti-free trade,
pro-environmental
platform. There are not only Red
Tories but also Green Tories. The late German deep green philosopher
Rudolf Bahro (1935-1997), spoke
of an ecological politics cutting across all the ‘isms’ of bourgeois
society and
spoke of a “radical conservatism”
or a “conservative anti-capitalism.” (2) In Canada, Robert Bateman, the
wildlife artist, who is also a
conservative, recently spoke out against the neo-conservatives, who in
his
view are
not conservatives at all because
they destroy “cherished institutions” and wreck “havoc on our human
heritage
as well as our natural heritage.”
(3) A green political formation will therefore theoretically draw from
conservatives who truly want to
“conserve” the natural world, but this does not mean the resolution of
the
ecological question is possible
within industrial capitalist society. For Bahro, it clearly was not -
and also not
for left biocentrist greens like
myself.
What is the
role of the green Left? Leading the move from a human-centered to an
ecocentric consciousness
is fundamental. We need to place
the welfare of the Earth and all its life forms first. “Community” has
to include
not just humans, but other
animals, plants and the Earth itself. In past animistic societies, this
was the situation.
We need to bring their sense of
Earth spirituality back. There is not only a liberal democracy, with
all its
limitations for deeper Greens,
but there is also an ecocentric democracy and governance. Ecocentric
justice is
much more inclusive than human
justice. A Green Party has to decide about all this, not just how to
run its
affairs democratically, from a
human-centered perspective.
The federal
Green Party says it endorses deep ecology in its Election Platform.
This support for deep
ecology is very significant, even
if much of the hurriedly thrown together Platform for the recent
federal
election goes against this
endorsement in practice and sucks up, in quite a disgusting manner, to
a corporate,
supposedly self-regulating
environmentalism. Green Party dissidents, critical of this rightward
direction with
its overall emphasis on economic
growth, e.g. boosting “job creation and productivity”, “increased
prosperity for all”, and
“increasing our global competitiveness”, call it “blue light”. When the
national business
newspaper, The Globe
and Mail, editorially speaks favourably of the Green Party, as it
did in the past
federal election, it means they
correctly read the reassuring corporate signals being sent out.
Ecology cannot
be an "add-on" to a general leftism, while remaining human-centered in
basic orientation.
Joan Russow, a leftist and former
leader of the federal Green Party, who defected to the New Democratic
Party and became a very public
attack dog for them against the Green Party in the run-up to the last
federal
election, showed such a social
justice-focussed consciousness, in her past tenure in the federal Green
Party.
For the deep
green, or ecocentric, Left, what it means to be a “deeper” Green, is
the primacy of ecocentric
consciousness - that is deep
ecology, and that social justice, while very important, is secondary to
such a
consciousness. The left-right
distinction is therefore secondary, and mainly concerns anthropocentric
politics
and regimes which are framed in
“liberal democratic” terminology. John Warnock closes his article saying
that history will judge the
Greens “by whether they stand with the world's poor.” This viewpoint is
called one
of “human-welfare ecology” by
Judith McKenzie in her recent book, Environmental Politics In Canada.(4)
One thinks of why this is not
a deep green quote, when remembering the Dedication for the 1993 book
Clearcut: The Tragedy of
Industrial Forestry, edited by Bill Devall. This book, with its
pictures and text
about clearcuts throughout North
America, has armed countless opponents of industrial forestry. The
book's
Dedication has always moved me
and put our own human environmental and social struggles in a larger
Earth
context:
“This book is in memory of the plantlife, birds,
insects, animals, and indigenous cultures that have
been driven to extinction by the greed and delusion
of human arrogance. All of us in the Industrial
Growth Society must take the responsibility for this
condition and make it our duty to halt the
continuation of economic and social structures that
perpetuate this ‘death of birth.’” (5)
SOME BASIC QUESTIONS ABOUT
GREEN ELECTORALISM
I have some
rather fundamental questions about the alleged green parliamentary road
forward, which prevent
me taking out a Green Party
membership.
- Is a
political party playing by rules set up to favour an industrial
capitalist status quo, within what is perhaps
misleadingly called “liberal
democracy”, not doomed to eventual absorption and neutralization? As
Judith
McKenzie, points out in her book,
“Canada's constitution is silent on the rights of non-human forms of
life.” (6)
- Does Green
Party activity not become a deceit, perpetrated against those living in
liberal democracies,
because of the very rules of
conduct set up for the participants? As McKenzie says, the “liberal
democratic
tradition” encompasses
“anthropocentrism or domination over nature, individual self interest
and competitive
lifestyle, capitalism and the
primacy of science and technology, representative democracy, the nation
state and
centralization.” (7) To this
McKenzie counterposes Ecologism/Deep Ecology/Ecocentrism: “ecocentrism
(harmony with nature),
communalism/co-operative lifestyle, sustainability, grass-roots/direct
democracy,
bioregions and decentralization.”
(8)
- How does
one reconcile the "oversell" or exaggeration of electoral politics,
well
shown by the leadership
of the federal Green Party in
the last election, with speaking necessary ecological truths about the
end of
industrial society as we know
it? The truth, for example, that material life, regarding consumption
of
industrial
consumer goods, will be much
worse in the future? As Saral Sarkar pointed out in his book Eco-socialism
or
Eco-capitalism?, the ecology
movement promises the shrinking of economic growth and a “lower
standard of
living.” (9) This means that if a
green party does not promise a lower material standard of living, it
is practising
electoral deception.
- If green
parties claim to be a political arm of the green and environmental
movements,
why is it, for example
in Canada, that this is just a
verbal claim, with no discussion of actual content?
- Why do green
party members seem to believe that what has happened to other green
parties, e.g. the
German Green Party, has no
seeming relevance for Canada and is basically ignored in policy
discussions?
- Why are long
time green party activists often so intolerant and dismissive of any
criticism which call into
question party activities?
I am a
movement Green and never was a party Green. I voted for the Green Party
in the recent election
and have been interested for many
years in what would be the appropriate political vehicle for the
embryonic
green movement in Canada. My
problem is, as long suffering Green friends know, that I feel that the
history
of social democratic and green
parties is one of ultimate absorption to the industrial status quo.
Rudolf Bahro,
one of our heroes (at least
mine), showed this in the early 80s with his resignation from the
German Green
Party. Yet the Green Party, warts
and all, is a huge step forward on the Canadian political map for those
seeing the necessity for an
Earth-centered consciousness.
August 2004
Published in the Socialist
Studies Bulletin, Number 74, Fall/Winter 2004; also
published in Synthesis/Regeneration
#36, Winter
2005.
Endnotes
1. Warnock, John, “‘Neither
Left Nor Right But Ahead.’ What is a Green?” Posted on various
green-oriented internet
discussion groups. It was posted by Stuart Hertzog on the
newgreencanada@yahoogroups.com
list serve on July 21, 2004.
2. Bahro, Rudolf, Avoiding
Social & Ecological Disaster: The Politics of World Transformation,
(Bath, Gateway Books, 1994), pp.
164-165. The term “conservative anti-capitalism” was used in a
personal letter by Bahro to me,
dated December 20, 1995.
3. Bateman, Robert, December 13,
2003, “Comment: I am a conservative, I conserve”, The
Globe and
Mail.
4. McKenzie, Judith, Environmental
Politics In Canada: Managing The Commons Into The Twenty-First
Century, (Don Mills, Oxford
University Press, 2002), p. 14.
5. Devall, Bill, editor, Clearcut:
The Tragedy Of Industrial Forestry, (San Francisco, Sierra Club
Books
and Earth Island Press, 1993), p.
3.
6. McKenzie, p. 22.
7. Ibid, p. 17. See Table
1.4 “Green Thought and the Liberal Democratic Tradition.”
8. Ibid, p. 17.
9. Sarkar, Saral, Eco-socialism
or Eco-capitalism? A critical analysis of humanity’s fundamental choices,
(London and New York, Zed Books,
1999), pp. 226-227. I do not accept that the choice is between eco-
capitalism or eco-socialism, as
the title of this book implies. The shape of the future economic
formation for an
ecocentric and green sustainable
society is yet to be determined.
To obtain any of the
Green Web publications, write to us at:
Green Web, R.R. #3, Saltsprings, Nova Scotia, Canada, BOK 1PO
E-mail us at: greenweb@ca.inter.net
Back
to
The Green Web
A Taste of Green Web
Writings and Left Biocentrism
http://home.ca.inter.net/~greenweb/Ecocentric
Left & Green Electoralism.html
Last updated: December 19, 2004